Semi-automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Recent studies have shown that real-time three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography (RT3DE) gives more accurate and reproducible left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) measurements than traditional two-dimensional methods. A new semi-automated tool (4DLVQ) for volume measurements in RT3DE has been developed. We sought to evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of this method compared to a 3D echo standard.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>LV end-diastolic volumes (EDV), end-systolic volumes (ESV), and EF measured using 4DLVQ were compared with a commercially available semi-automated analysis tool (TomTec 4D LV-Analysis ver. 2.2) in 35 patients. Repeated measurements were performed to investigate inter- and intra-observer variability.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Average analysis time of the new tool was 141s, significantly shorter than 261s using TomTec (<it>p </it>< 0.001). Bland Altman analysis revealed high agreement of measured EDV, ESV, and EF compared to TomTec (<it>p </it>= <it>NS</it>), with bias and 95% limits of agreement of 2.1 ± 21 ml, -0.88 ± 17 ml, and 1.6 ± 11% for EDV, ESV, and EF respectively. Intra-observer variability of 4DLVQ vs. TomTec was 7.5 ± 6.2 ml vs. 7.7 ± 7.3 ml for EDV, 5.5 ± 5.6 ml vs. 5.0 ± 5.9 ml for ESV, and 3.0 ± 2.7% vs. 2.1 ± 2.0% for EF (<it>p </it>= <it>NS</it>). The inter-observer variability of 4DLVQ vs. TomTec was 9.0 ± 5.9 ml vs. 17 ± 6.3 ml for EDV (<it>p </it>< 0.05), 5.0 ± 3.6 ml vs. 12 ± 7.7 ml for ESV (<it>p </it>< 0.05), and 2.7 ± 2.8% vs. 3.0 ± 2.1% for EF (<it>p </it>= <it>NS</it>).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In conclusion, the new analysis tool gives rapid and reproducible measurements of LV volumes and EF, with good agreement compared to another RT3DE volume quantification tool.</p